SESSION OF 1999



SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE BILL NO. 131



As Amended by House Committee on Judiciary





Brief(1)



S.B. 131 makes major revisions in the Kansas sentencing guidelines law. The bill increases the length of sentences for certain crimes and for severity level III crimes on the nondrug sentencing grid; reduces the length of sentences for certain crimes and for severity levels I and II crimes on the nondrug grid; and makes other changes.



Provisions which increase the length of sentence include the following.







The following provisions of S.B. 131 reduce the length of sentence as noted below.









Other changes contained in S.B. 131 include the following.







The Senate Committee deleted a proposed Hard 50 provision that would have replaced the current Hard 40 law.



The Senate Committee of the Whole amendment was technical.



The House Committee amended the bill to do the following:







Background



The bill was requested by the Kansas Sentencing Commission which conducted a comprehensive review of the Kansas Sentencing laws last fall. Representatives of the Commission said the changes were needed to bring a sense of proportionality for all felony sentences. During the past five years numerous changes have been made to the sentencing guidelines in a fragmented manner.



A representative of the Governor's Office generally supported the bill, but opposed the 20 percent reduction in the levels I and II nondrug grid.



The Attorney General supported the penalty enhancements contained in the bill but opposed all provisions in the bill which would result in reduced sentences.



The Kansas County and District Attorneys Association generally supported the bill but opposed the Romeo and Juliet provision, raised concerns about treating serious traffic offenders differently than DUIs, and raised other concerns.



The Secretary of Corrections supported S.B. 131 but opposed the 20 percent reduction in sentences for levels I and II nondrug grid offenders.



The Kansas Parole Board favored the waiver provision of the final revocation.



The Kansas Peace Officers Association opposed the reduction in penalties for the Romeo and Juliet offender.



The Reno County Attorney opposed the deletion of the crime of felony offense for driving while suspended and driving as an habitual violator. He also opposed the so-called Romeo and Juliet provision.



The fiscal note estimates the bill will have a net $118,800 increase in State General Fund expenditures for FY 2000 as a result of increased costs for the State Board of Indigents Defense Services; and a one-time net expenditure of $24,427 by the Kansas Sentencing Commission. The Sentencing Commission also estimates the bill would increase prison capacity needs by 113 beds. Further analysis is needed to determine the timing and custody level of the 113 beds estimated to be needed.

1. *Supplemental notes are prepared by the Legislative Research Department and do not express legislative intent. The supplemental note and fiscal note for this bill may be accessed on the Internet at http://www.ink.org/public/legislative/bill_search.html.